People v. Radinsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• improper use of the claim of an attorney’s retaining lien in order to extort fees despite prejudice to the client’s cause is an ethical violation justifying disbarment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-06-25· cited 247×
• Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-11-12· cited 67×
• Succession of Wallace
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-01-22· cited 50×
• Olsen and Brown v. City of Englewood
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-01-30· cited 34×
• Ramos v. Lamm
  D. Colorado· 1982-03-26· cited 27×
• Academy of California Optometrists, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-10-07· cited 20×
• Law Offices of J.E. Losavio v. Law Firm of Michael W. McDivitt, P.C.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-11-15· cited 18×
• Succession of Jenkins
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-01-28· cited 15×
• Potts v. Mitchell
  W.D. North Carolina· 1976-02-23· cited 13×
• National Sales & Service Co. v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-07-21· cited 12×
• People v. Harthun
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-01-15· cited 10×
• People v. McGonigle
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-09-04· cited 7×
• People v. Kendrick
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-03-01· cited 5×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Radinsky
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1971-11-15· cited 22×
• In Re Quinn
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1957-11-12· cited 10×
• Hubbard v. Goffinett
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1934-04-17· cited 10×