People v. Rachel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defense stipulation to defendant’s identity and presence in home where assault took place did not preclude State’s proof on those points
• defense stipulation to defendant's identity and presence in home where assault took place did not preclude State's proof on those points
• defense stipulation to defendant's identity and presence in home where assault took place did not preclude State's proof on those points
• “It is axiomatic that a defendant cannot complain of error in instructions to which he has acquiesced, induced or invited or which were given at his request ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).