People v. Qadir Y.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state’s regulation of oil-well spacing and integrity meant that federal regulation, while extensive, was not exclusive
• holding that the state’s regulation of oil-well spacing and integrity meant that federal regulation, while extensive, was not exclusive
• explaining that BLM and NMOCD entered into a memorandum of understanding, in which BLM adopted the state standards for well spacing and setbacks on Indian lands
• explaining that BLM and NMOCD entered into a memorandum of understanding, in which BLM adopted the state standards for well spacing and setbacks on Indian lands
• noting that the Indian Commerce clause “confers more extensive power on Congress than does the Interstate Commerce Clause”
• explaining that \the Interstate Commerce and Indian Commerce Clauses have different applications\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).