· 5/9/1989
People v. Provencio
Citations
- 210 Cal. App. 3d 290
- 258 Cal. Rptr. 330
- 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the trial court’s ruling on an excited utterance exception will not be disturbed on appeal unless the facts on which it relied are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.