Skip to main content
· 5/9/1989

People v. Provencio

Citations

  • 210 Cal. App. 3d 290
  • 258 Cal. Rptr. 330
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the trial court’s ruling on an excited utterance exception will not be disturbed on appeal unless the facts on which it relied are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.