Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/8/2008
People v. Prouty
Citations
- 895 N.E.2d 48
- 385 Ill. App. 3d 149
- 324 Ill. Dec. 48
- 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- challenge to validity of subsection (d)(1)(A) of section 11-501 asserting that Public Act 94-609 made enactment ineffective by omitting language of prior amendment in later amendment could not stand since the two acts did not irreconcilably conflict
- challenge to validity of subsection (d)(1)(A) of section 11 — 501 asserting that Public Act 94— 609 made enactment ineffective by omitting language of prior amendment in later amendment could not stand since the two acts did not irreconcilably conflict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLAREN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.