People v. Pritchett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where officer in course of investigatory stop determined that bulge in defendant’s pocket was tobacco or similar substance, officer not justified in seizing and opening object, since he no longer had reasonable basis to believe that suspect was armed or dangerous
• where officer in course of investigatory stop determined that bulge in defendant's pocket was tobacco or similar substance, officer not justified in seizing and opening object, since he no longer had reasonable basis to believe that suspect was armed or dangerous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Ratcliff
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-09-18· cited 63×
• People v. Vena
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-02-29· cited 38×
• People v. Day
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-09-26· cited 34×
• United States v. Keller
  N.D. Illinois· 1980-10-21· cited 13×
• People v. McGrew
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-10-29· cited 8×
• People v. Campbell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-10-05· cited 7×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Sibron v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
• United States v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
• Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  Supreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
• Gustafson v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 699×
• United States v. Hewey Lee Thompson
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-05-16· cited 60×
• People v. Palmer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-01-26· cited 32×
• People v. Felton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-06-14· cited 18×
• People v. Blakes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-12-21· cited 12×