People v. Prince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating denial of the credit provided by section 110-14 against a defendant’s fines, based on retroactive application of an amendment to the statute, would increase the punishment for a previously committed offense
• “A fine *** is a pecuniary punishment imposed as a part of a criminal sentence and is subject to the prohibition against ex post facto laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Varghese
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-19· cited 37×
• People v. Carter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-11-01· cited 19×
• People v. Ruback
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-04-22· cited 18×
• People v. Robinson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-03-28· cited 15×
• People v. Vlahon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-10-11· cited 11×
• People v. Scalise
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-08-07· cited 3×
• People v. Dalton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-12-29
• People v. Grayer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-08-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Calder v. Bull
  Supreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
• People v. Woodard
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-02-20· cited 387×
• People v. Malchow
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-09-21· cited 309×
• Fletcher v. Williams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 48×
• People v. Bishop
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-13· cited 44×
• People v. Delgado
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-17· cited 7×