People v. Prastien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant insurer was permitted to cancel the contract retroactively “in accordance with both contract and statute”
• characterizing the contract as “unambiguously stat[ing] that . . . termination would be retroactively effective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).