Skip to main content
· 6/8/2001

People v. Povio

Citations

  • 284 A.D.2d 1011
  • 725 N.Y.S.2d 784
  • 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a traditional surrogacy agreement “was not contemplated by ... the New York legislature when it enacted [the statute] prohibiting payments in connection with an adoption”
  • finding that a traditional surrogacy agreement “was not contemplated by . . . the New York legislature when it enacted [the statute] prohibiting payments in connection with an adoption”
  • finding that a traditional surrogacy agreement “was not contemplated by . . . the New York legislature when it enacted [the statute] prohibiting payments in connection with an adoption”
  • indicating that “excess payments” in surrogacy contracts should not be permitted
  • indicating that “excess payments” in surrogacy contracts should not be permitted
  • indicating that “excess payments” in surrogacy contracts should not be permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.