California Supreme Court· 7/1/1879
People v. Pope
Citations
- 53 Cal. 437
Syllabus
<p>Dedication oe East Street.—East Street, in San Francisco, between Market and Folsom Streets, has been duly dedicated as a public street.</p> <p>Bight to Obstruct a Street.—Ho one can acquire by adverse occupation, as against the public, the right to obstruct a street dedicated to public use, and thus-prevent the use of it as a public highway.</p>
Judges: Crockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1889-09-05· cited 66×
- People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-01-26· cited 57×
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-03-23· cited 53×
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-02-24· cited 42×
- Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-08-03· cited 29×
- Baldwin v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-04-01· cited 29×
- City of Visalia v. JacobCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-07-26· cited 28×
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-07-13· cited 27×
- Ex parte TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-12-13· cited 22×
- Grogan v. Town of HaywardU.S. Circuit Court· 1880-10-06· cited 17×
- People ex rel. Robarts v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-09-16· cited 15×
- Abar v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-02-15· cited 12×
- Schneider v. HutchinsonOregon Supreme Court· 1899-05-29· cited 11×
- County of Sacramento v. LauszusCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-08-30· cited 8×
- City of Berkeley v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-07-29· cited 3×
- Proctor v. City & County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 1900-02-05· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.