People v. Pons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The monitoring of [a] telephone pager device is more intrusive than the use of a pen register. The pager device is capable of conveying substantive information by combining digits in various sequences. Both telephone numbers and coded messages may be conveyed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wojtyna
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-26· cited 22×
• Brown v. Waddell
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-03-30· cited 16×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-13· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Smith v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
• Berger v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
• People v. Teicher
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-05-12· cited 95×
• Lybrand v. Levitt
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-06-22· cited 64×
• People v. Abruzzi
  New York Court of Appeals· 1977-05-12· cited 23×
• People v. Matteo
  New York Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 4×