People v. Pomar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing of Title VII claim does not toll the period for filing a s.1981 suit
• holding that 42 U.S.C. § 1981 affords a federal remedy against discrimination in private employment, despite the lack of an express cause of action in the statutory language
• holding that, despite Title VIPs comprehensive scope, plaintiff is not precluded from other remedies in search of relief
• holding that a plaintiff is not entitled to equitable tolling of the limitations period for a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 during the pendency of an EEOC administrative complaint
• holding that under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, claims are not tolled by the filing of a charge with the EEOC
• holding that where there is no specifically stated or otherwise relevant federal statute of limitations, the controlling period will be the most appropriate one provided by state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).