People v. Poe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence
• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence
• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence
• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Minter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-09-09· cited 45×
• People v. Diaz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-11-07· cited 26×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The People v. Dewey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1969-03-27· cited 75×
• United States v. Alvin Jones
  Seventh Circuit· 1971-03-18· cited 68×
• The People v. Outten
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1958-01-24· cited 56×
• The PEOPLE v. Palmer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-12-04· cited 50×
• People v. Gonzales
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-07-02· cited 24×
• United States v. Jose Antonio Rivera
  Seventh Circuit· 1971-02-03· cited 9×