People v. Pisarski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• articles were mostly factual and did not contain prejudicial information; jurors who had read articles swore that they were not affected
• articles were mostly factual and did not contain prejudicial information; jurors who had read articles swore that they were not affected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).