People v. Pimentel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a licensee did not have standing to sue under § 43(a) because of “the rights granted to the licensee in the licensing agreement” (quotation marks omitted)
• finding that licensing agreement’s terms “read together . . . indicate[d] that [the trademark owner] alone ha[d] the exclusive right to sue for infringement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).