People v. Pietryzk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• completeness doctrine inapplicable to statement that did not “shed light” on the meaning of oral statements but, rather, contradicted them
• statements were inadmissible under completeness doctrine where they did not explain or qualify admitted statements but merely contradicted them
• completeness doctrine inapplicable to statement that did not \shed light\ on the meaning of oral statements but, rather, contradicted them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).