People v. Pierre-Louis (Nicolas)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that fraudulent inducement plaintiffs may seek “compensatory damages in the form of lost profits” that would have been received if the representations had been true, if those damages can be established “with reasonable certainty”
• “In Virginia, it is well-settled that contractual provisions that merely set out agreements to negotiate future subcontracts are unenforceable.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The existence of an express contract covering the same subject matter of the parties’ dispute precludes a claim for unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).