People v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s sentence could not be increased even though his conviction was vacated by the trial court pursuant to a motion for a new trial rather than by direct appellate review or collateral attack
• defendant's sentence could not be increased even though his conviction was vacated by the trial court pursuant to a motion for a new trial rather than by direct appellate review or collateral attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Caballero
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 434×
• People v. Finley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-12-28· cited 23×
• Szkoda v. ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-16· cited 20×
• People v. Jackson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-09-09· cited 17×
• People v. Miller
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-02-07· cited 15×
• People v. Adams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-12· cited 14×
• People v. Pittman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-13· cited 12×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-07-21· cited 8×
• People v. Hooker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-05-19· cited 7×
• Szkoda v. Human Rights Comm'n
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blackledge v. Perry
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
• Harvey Firemen's Ass'n v. City of Harvey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-01-26· cited 55×
• Anderson v. Schneider
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 39×
• People v. Beam
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-01-12· cited 29×
• People v. Sweeny
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-02-17· cited 12×