People v. Phoenix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a “Rule 403 analysis generally balances the following four factors, though they are not exclusive: (1) how probative the evidence is, (2) the potential of the evidence to impress the jury in some irrational, but nevertheless indelible way; (3
• “A defendant may not raise a matter for the first time in a motion for new trial if he had the opportunity to raise it at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).