People v. Perryman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[t]he crime of accessory is separate and distinct from the underlying felony... the defendant ... may be charged with only one act of being an accessory after the fact\
• holding that ”[t]he crime of accessory is separate and distinct from the underlying felony ... the defendant ... may be charged with only one act of being an accessory after the fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Garceau
  California Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 268×
• People v. Burns
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-12-16· cited 31×
• Bowen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-08· cited 22×
• Heard v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-12· cited 16×
• People v. Partee
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-03-21· cited 1×
• People v. Partee
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-03-21
• People v. Partee
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-04-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Milan
  California Supreme Court· 1973-03-28· cited 159×
• People v. Failla
  California Supreme Court· 1966-05-16· cited 157×
• People v. McNeill
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-11-19· cited 58×
• People v. Thompson
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-09-21· cited 57×
• People v. Vela Prado
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-02-16· cited 56×
• People v. Crawford
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-04-26· cited 39×
• People v. Wesley
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-02-07· cited 14×