People v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements during summation are permissible if they constitute a “fair comment on the evidence” at trial and reasonable inference therefrom, or a “fair. response to remarks made by the defense counsel during summation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. Annucci
  N.D. New York· 2015-08-26· cited 12×
• People v. Prince
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-01-23· cited 10×
• Ogletree v. Graham
  N.D. New York· 2008-03-31· cited 3×
• Osorio v. Conway
  S.D. New York· 2007-07-17· cited 3×
• People v. Desir
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-01-16· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. . Molineux
  New York Court of Appeals· 1901-10-15· cited 2,413×
• People v. Medina
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-06-02· cited 407×
• People v. Turner
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-06-27· cited 26×
• People v. Persaud
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-03-24· cited 20×
• People v. Stith
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-02-25· cited 9×
• People v. Baltimore
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-01-21· cited 8×
• People v. Maxwell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-11-04· cited 5×