People v. Penrod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion where the trial court “excised the irrelevant and most prejudicial information” before admitting the evidence contested under CRE 403
• legislative amendments to the habitual criminal statute that significantly reduced a defendant’s sentencing exposure should be considered when reviewing for constitutional proportionality
• aggravated motor vehicle theft “may not be characterized as lacking in gravity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).