People v. Pendleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The 'pre-Harris ' rule can be stated as follows: 'Courts have repeatedly emphasized that no reliable conclusion can be drawn when total population rather than voter population is used as a base.' \
• “The ‘pre-Har-ris ’ rule can be stated as follows: ‘Courts have repeatedly emphasized that no reliable conclusion can be drawn when total population rather than voter population is used as a base.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Myers
  California Supreme Court· 1987-01-02· cited 77×
• Venson Lane Myers v. Eddie S. Ylst, Warden
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-02-28· cited 30×
• In Re Travis W.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-03-25· cited 16×
• People v. Travis W.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-03-25· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stovall v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
• Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1962-03-22· cited 2,916×
• People v. Dillon
  California Supreme Court· 1983-09-01· cited 1,034×
• Carlos v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1983-12-12· cited 473×
• People v. Garcia
  California Supreme Court· 1984-08-06· cited 262×
• People v. Harris
  California Supreme Court· 1984-04-20· cited 239×
• People v. Williams
  California Supreme Court· 1981-12-31· cited 122×
• People v. Lewis
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-11-02· cited 17×
• People v. Cantu
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-10-25· cited 6×