People v. Pena (Nelson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a Title IX violation requires a systemic and substantial disparity amounting to a denial of equal opportunity
• “Without a federal claim in the case, the district court appropriately dismissed Plaintiffs’ state law claims without prejudice, thereby relinquishing subject matter jurisdiction over the remaining claims.”
• “Without a federal claim in the case, the district court appropriately dismissed Plaintiffs’ state law claims without prejudice, thereby relinquishing subject matter jurisdiction over the remaining claims.”
• “In reviewing a motion to dismiss based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the Court construes all allegations and any reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” (alteration adopted) (emphasis added)
• distinguishing between direct and indirect Title IX claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).