Skip to main content

People v. Pearson

Citations

  • 833 N.E.2d 827
  • 216 Ill. 2d 58
  • 295 Ill. Dec. 621
  • 2005 Ill. LEXIS 956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the requirements set forth in Shellstrom also apply when a trial court recharacterizes a pleading as a successive postconviction petition
  • holding that Shellstrom applies when a trial court recharacterizes as a successive postconviction petition a pleading that a pro se litigant has labeled as a different action
  • holding that the requirements set forth in Shellstrom also apply when a trial court re-characterizes a pleading as a successive postconviction petition
  • holding that Shellstrom applies when a trial court recharacterizes as a successive postconviction petition a pleading that a pro se litigant has labeled as a different action
  • ruling these admonitions apply where defendant files a pro se section 2-1401 petition and circuit court recharacterizes it as a successive postconviction petition under the Act
  • holding the three-step Shellstrom notice procedure applies to “recharacterizing as a successive postconviction petition a pleading that a pro se litigant has labeled as a different action cognizable under Illinois law” (emphases added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.