Skip to main content

People v. Patel

Citations

  • 851 N.E.2d 747
  • 366 Ill. App. 3d 255
  • 303 Ill. Dec. 560
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that solicitation of murder for hire did not require that money change hands but only that there was some type of agreement or request for money or anything of value
  • holding that points not supported by adequate argument are forfeited
  • finding no plain error where jury instructions read in open court correctly stated the law, but copies were not distributed to the jury until after jury commenced deliberations and jury returned verdicts fifteen minutes thereafter
  • a point raised but not sufficiently presented fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 341(h)(7) and is, therefore, waived
  • “It is well settled that points not argued in appellant’s opening brief are waived and shall not be raised in the reply brief’
  • the defendant forfeited plain error review when he failed to explain how either prong of the plain-error standard was applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBRIDE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.