People v. Pappadiakis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mandatory severance was not necessary where the challenged evidence did not “implicate[] or refer[] to [the] defendant, and the court . . . instructed the jury that the evidence was not to be considered against the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).