People v. Pantzza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the totality of the circumstances test also meets the requirements of Article I, Section 8 of our Pennsylvania Constitution
• holding that the totality of the circumstances test also meets the requirements of Article I, Section 8 of our Pennsylvania Constitution
• holding this Court did not err in retroactively applying “common–sense, practical approach” to probable cause standards when affirming trial court’s denial of suppression motion
• relying on Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
• finding \no substantial textual difference\ between the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 8 that would justify maintaining a more stringent standard in Pennsylvania
• finding “no substantial textual difference” between the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 8 that would justify maintaining a more stringent standard in Pennsylvania

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).