People v. Palombi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enforcing parties’ choice of law for statute of limitations purposes and citing § 187
• a judge must “determine,” by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant has sufficient contacts with the Commonwealth to allow for personal jurisdiction
• in opposing motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations, plaintiff must present competent materials supporting entitlement to relief
• in deciding rule 12(b)(6) motion, as in other contexts, “[m]atters are judicially noticed only when they are indisputably true”
• in deciding rule 12(b)(6) motion, as in other contexts, “[m]atters are judicially noticed only when they are indisputably true”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).