People v. Page

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior consistent statement is admissible after the witness’s testimony has been attacked, “but only if it was made before the motive to fabricate arose”
• holding that a prior consistent statement is admissible after the witness's testimony has been attacked, \but only if it was made before the motive to fabricate arose\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Hernandez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-08-15· cited 78×
• People v. Cunningham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-10-28· cited 11×
• State v. Bujan
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2006-08-03· cited 9×
• People v. Gant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-04· cited 4×
• People v. Patrasso
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-02-23· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maynard v. Cartwright
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,367×
• People v. La Pointe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 680×
• People v. Clark
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-10-02· cited 294×
• People v. Harris
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 265×
• People v. Bryant
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 237×
• People v. Hope
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-03-27· cited 25×
• People v. Walker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-08-27· cited 17×
• People v. Barnhill
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-19· cited 17×
• People v. Kane
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-02-13· cited 13×
• People v. Klinkhammer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-31· cited 9×
• People v. McDonald
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-11-01· cited 7×