People v. Padilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• since Wiedemer holding establishing affirmative pleading requirement was announced after sentencing hearing in which defendant did not assert excusable neglect or justifiable excuse, defendant was entitled to remand for presentation of evidence on such issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Xue Xiong
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-06-26· cited 175×
• People v. Padilla
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1996-01-08· cited 27×
• McCallum v. Dana's Housekeeping
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-10-24· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Wiedemer
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-05-10· cited 1,008×
• People v. Schuett
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-07-13· cited 42×
• People v. Lanford
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-06-03· cited 6×