People v. Overturf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that cases involving preindictment delay do not \come within the purview of the Sixth Amendment and [are] governed by the separate standards found in the Lawson opinion\
• finding that cases involving preindictment delay do not “come within the purview of the Sixth Amendment and [are] governed by the separate standards found in the Lawson opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-02-10· cited 14×
• People v. Leavitt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-13· cited 14×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Lawson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-10-17· cited 247×
• People v. Nichols
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-06-14· cited 37×
• People v. Walters
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-02-20· cited 27×
• People v. Gulley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-09· cited 11×
• People v. DiBenedetto
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-02-09· cited 4×