People v. Ottinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by denying the respondent “a full hearing on conditional release or discharge” where conflicting opinions were presented and the court gave greater weight to those of the State’s experts
• holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by denying the respondent \a full hearing on conditional release or discharge\ where conflicting opinions were presented and the court gave greater weight to those of the State's experts
• holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by denying the respondent \a full hearing on conditional release or discharge\ where conflicting opinions were presented and the court gave greater weight to those of the State's experts
• section 25(e) pertains to proceedings on the petition under section 15 of the Act, not to proceedings under sections 55, 60, and 65
• section 25 does not apply to sections 55, 60, and 65 of the Act (725 ILCS 207/25, 55, 60, 65 (West 2000))
• generally noting that the trial court’s decision not to proceed to an evidentiary hearing following a probable-cause hearing is reviewed only for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).