Skip to main content

People v. Orr

Citations

  • 43 Cal. App. 3d 666
  • 117 Cal. Rptr. 738
  • 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 1346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the jury “was justified in convicting defendant as a direct principal in the [grand] theft or as an aider and abettor to his companion who was driving the car” and noting that an aider and abettor is regarded under California law as a principal
  • evidence sufficient to sustain conviction for grand theft of a bovine animal under § 487(3) on theory that defendant was either a direct principal in the theft or was an aider and abettor
  • At pp. 556-557, fn. 14.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.