People v. O'Neil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant’s due process rights not affected when Secretary confirmed the suspension of the defendant’s driving privileges more than five months after the defendant received notice that his driving privileges would be suspended 46 days after his arrest
• the defendant’s due process rights were not affected when the Secretary of State confirmed the suspension of the defendant’s driving privileges more than five months after the defendant received notice that his driving privileges would be suspended 46 days after his arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Bywater
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-06-01· cited 8×
• People v. Raupp
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-04-22
• People v. Swanson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-07-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Schaefer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 54×
• People v. Eidel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-03-15· cited 29×
• People v. Hart
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-06· cited 16×
• People v. Wireman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-04-03· cited 10×
• People v. Owen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-07-18· cited 5×