New York Court of Appeals· 6/5/1968
People v. Olsen
Citations
- 22 N.Y.2d 230
- 239 N.E.2d 354
- 292 N.Y.S.2d 420
- 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding officer’s visual speed estimate of vehicle traveling 50-55 mph in a 30-mph zone sufficient to support speeding conviction
- holding officer’s visual speed estimate of vehicle traveling 50-55 mph in a 30-mph zone suf- ficient to support speeding conviction
- Variance of 20 to 25 miles above speed limit was clearly sufficient to justify a finding of guilt
- although police officer’s estimate that defendant was traveling 50 to 55 miles per hour in a 30-mile-per-hour zone was sufficient to sustain a conviction of speeding, testimony that the vehicle was proceeding at 35 to 40 miles per hour might not have sufficed
- although police officer's estimate that defendant was traveling 50 to 55 miles per hour in a 30-mile-per-hour zone was sufficient to sustain a conviction of speeding, testimony that the vehicle was proceeding at 35 to 40 miles per hour might not have sufficed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keating
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Soto v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals· 2006-03-23· cited 60×
- United States v. Sean SowardsFourth Circuit· 2012-06-26· cited 45×
- State v. KimesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-08-15· cited 29×
- People v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-02-27· cited 20×
- People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals· 1988-10-27· cited 19×
- Swoboda v. We Try Harder, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-03-30· cited 14×
- State v. EstesIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-12-01· cited 11×
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-05-31· cited 11×
- Sulli v. Appeals Board the Administrative Adjudication BureauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-01-21· cited 11×
- DeOliveira v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-04-17· cited 11×
- Neiman v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-25· cited 10×
- People v. ChristmannNewark Justice Court· 2004-01-16· cited 10×
- Graf v. FoschioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-06-25· cited 9×
- Martin v. AdduciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-03-21· cited 9×
- People v. GuttersonLattingtown Village Court· 1978-04-06· cited 9×
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-09-20· cited 7×
- People v. GrennonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-07-27· cited 7×
- People v. Wahl (Michael)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-04-28· cited 7×
- Pernick v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-07-17· cited 6×
- Gentile v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-06-05· cited 6×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Senecal v. DrolletteNew York Court of Appeals· 1952-10-23· cited 16×
- Penny v. Rochester Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1896-07-01· cited 12×
- Fisher v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1903-07-01· cited 5×
- Shulman v. Roseth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1930-01-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.