People v. Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a vending machine is a \depository designed for the safekeeping of property\ under a statute proscribing possession of burglary tools—rule of strict construction recognized
• a vending machine is a “depository designed for the safekeeping of property” under a statute proscribing possession of burglary tools — rule of strict construction recognized
• a vending machine is a depository

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. VanZile
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-05-23· cited 33×
• Boyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-14· cited 24×
• State v. Newman
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-12-23· cited 21×
• People v. Rogers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-04-01· cited 14×
• People v. Hoover
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-28· cited 10×
• People v. Epperley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-12-11· cited 9×
• People v. Savaiano
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-09-23· cited 9×
• County of McHenry v. Duenser
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-05-31· cited 5×
• People v. Knight
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-10-06· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Hogan
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-08-09· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The PEOPLE v. Weaver
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 87×
• The PEOPLE v. Peto
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 39×
• The People v. Kirkrand
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1947-09-18· cited 37×
• The People v. Tate
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 31×
• The PEOPLE v. Glass
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1959-05-22· cited 17×
• The People v. Elmore
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 13×
• People v. Dilworth
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-02-08· cited 11×