Skip to main content

People v. Ogunmola

Citations

  • 193 Cal. App. 3d 274
  • 238 Cal. Rptr. 300
  • 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • patient who consented to gynecological examination was in fact subjected to a sex act; consent held to be vitiated
  • the jury or judge may resolve conflicting testimonial evidence that an obstetrician/gynecologist raped two patients although the physician claimed that the configuration of the examining room made such events highly unlikely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danielson, Klein, Lui

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.