People v. Odneal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘Should the garbled portions be so substantial, in view of the purpose for which the tapes are offered, as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy, admissibility will be denied.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alonzi v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-07-02· cited 25×
• State v. Treadwell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-02-25· cited 16×
• People v. in the Interest of A.D.T.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-04-29· cited 16×
• People v. Coca
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-03-09· cited 15×
• People v. Alonzi
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-07-10· cited 7×
• People Ex Rel. Adt
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-04-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lamar v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-05-25· cited 79×
• United States v. Gilbert Clarence Young
  Eighth Circuit· 1973-12-06· cited 22×
• People v. Quintana
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-09-15· cited 18×

Other cases named People v. Odneal

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Odneal
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-09-29· cited 2×