People v. Northrop, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant must make an intentional 22 decision with respect to plaintiff’s health in order to be liable for denying medical care
• explaining that “chronic and 14 substantial pain” can indicate the existence of a serious medical need for Eighth 15 Amendment purposes
• stating that a detainee with symptoms, including “difficulty breathing, [and] severe 7 chest pain radiating to [his] arm,” had shown a “substantial risk of serious harm”
• stating that “[t]here is no legitimate claim of entitlement to a 25 grievance procedure”
• denying qualified immunity where a doctor did not order hospitalization of an inmate exhibiting clear signs of a heart attack
• using Fourteenth Amendment standard to evaluate claims of an individual held at county jail after being arrested for a probation violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).