People v. Niemiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where it was “obvious” that someone was driving, the issue was whether evidence sufficed to prove the defendant was the driver
• “[I]f a person is shown to be operating a vehicle, that person is also, by the very nature of operating that vehicle, exerting actual physical control over the vehicle.”
• harmless error to admit alcohol test where other \external indicators\ established intoxication
• harmless error to admit alcohol test where other “external indicators” established intoxication
• harmless error to admit alcohol test where other \external indicators\ established intoxication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).