People v. Nicholas L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that resolution of the first issue was dispositive but nonetheless addressing respondent’s remaining sufficiency- of-the-evidence argument
• noting that resolution of the first issue was dispositive but nonetheless addressing respondent’s remaining sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument
• noting that the right to written notice is not subject to harmless error
• classifying such testimony as benefits testimony, though adequacy of benefits testimony was not at issue
• applying manifest weigh of the evidence standard where there is a lack of sufficient evidence
• “[T]he right to receive written notification under section 2-102(a-5) cannot be waived by a respondent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).