People v. Nibbio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that buttocks are not part of the sex organs or anus and, consequently, fondling the buttocks was not “sexual conduct”
• positing that sexual contact with an alleged victim’s “ ‘buttocks’ ” does not constitute sexual contact with the alleged victim’s “ ‘anus’ ”
• interpreting the former version of the statute, which mirrored the relevant language of the current version of the definition of sexual conduct
• interpreting the former version of the statute, which mirrored the relevant language of the current version of the definition of sexual conduct
• interpreting the former version of the statute mirroring the current version’s definition of “sexual conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).