People v. Nehrkorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to substantially comply with statute could not be proven where owner of land failed to explain how she was prejudiced by scrivener’s error in notice of tax sale
• explaining that, pursuant to Trial Rule 72(E), a party was entitled to an extension of time to file a motion to correct error where the party did not receive notice of an order and the CCS did not contain evidence that the clerk had mailed the order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).