People v. Nazim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he [Board] is a factfinder and, as such, may draw inferences by virtue of this role.”
• “The [Board] was authorized to draw a different inference [than the AU] from the evidence of [claimant’s] physical condition and unsuccessful job search.”
• “[W]hether or not a later appellate court would view the ALJ’s findings as supported by a preponderance, the [Board’s] substituted findings must be accepted if there was evidence to support them.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).