People v. Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requiring a defendant to vacate a sentencing agreement before appealing in a case where defendant did not plead guilty would be a “radical extension of Rule 604(d)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Digirolamo
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-10-23· cited 116×
• People v. Caballero
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-24· cited 15×
• People v. Kalwa
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-30· cited 8×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Wilk
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-10-20· cited 359×
• The PEOPLE v. Pride
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1959-01-23· cited 124×
• People v. Allen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1952-09-17· cited 45×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-10-23· cited 10×