People v. Myrieckes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for resentencing because the record suggested the trial court erroneously believed the defendant was extended-term eligible
• remanding for resentencing because the record suggested the trial court erroneously believed the defendant was extended-term eligible
• remanding for resentencing because the record suggested the trial court erroneously believed the defendant was extended-term eligible
• court held defendant cannot challenge on appeal sufficiency of evidence to support voluntary plea to statutory crime and recognized general proposition without elaboration that defendant may plead to \nonexistent crime\
• court held defendant cannot challenge on appeal sufficiency of evidence to support voluntary plea to statutory crime and recognized general proposition without elaboration that defendant may plead to \nonexistent crime\
• in determining whether a mistaken belief influenced a sentencing decision a reviewing court looks to whether the trial court’s comments demonstrate its reliance on a mistaken belief or used the mistaken belief as a reference point in fashioning the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).