People v. Musgrave

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mistrial should have been granted when defendant was denied access to identity of confidential informant
• mistrial should have been granted when defendant was denied access to identity of confidential informant
• “When it was established that the purported informant was an eyewitness and earwitness to the sale, and participated to the extent that he did, the court should have ordered disclosure of the informant’s identity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).