People v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the New York caselaw on the issue requires an unauthorized “occupation” of a vehicle coupled with “exercise of at least some degree of control over the vehicle as manifested by the defendants’ present ability to set the vehicle in motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anderson v. J.D.
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-12-22· cited 4×
• People v. Velez
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1990-12-06· cited 3×
• State v. Hoag
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-28· cited 3×
• In Interest of JD
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-12-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Alejandro
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-06-11· cited 811×
• People v. McCaleb
  New York Court of Appeals· 1969-11-26· cited 77×
• People v. Roby
  New York Court of Appeals· 1976-03-25· cited 30×
• People v. Butler
  New York Supreme Court· 1983-07-07· cited 9×