People v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• judicial finding that the defendant formed new intent in committing second crime did not violate Apprendi because “no single sentence exceeds the statutorily authorizedmaximum sentence”
• judicial finding that the defendant formed new intent in committing second crime did not violate Apprendi because \no single sentence exceeds the statutorily authorized maximum sentence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kahapea
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 59×
• State v. Tanner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-20· cited 26×
• State v. Keene
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-07-10· cited 14×
• State v. Senske
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-03-01· cited 13×
• People v. Bludson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-02-04· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• People v. Wagener
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-06-01· cited 218×
• People v. Murray
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-11-19· cited 4×